GlowBall Warming a FRAUD?! 

Why, say it ain't so!

Longtime readers know the olde Rumbears position on man made GlowBall Warming. It is, has been and will continue to be a hoax.  I have read the books and written inumerable musings on the failing thereof.  So much so that I tired of the topic.  Well, it's back.   Recently, hackers accessed the files of the leading scientists supporting GlowBall Warming and found evidence of fraud.  Literally, they have been cooking the scientific data to get their desired results.  It's a fraud, a hoax.

......revealed by a thousand or so emails, documents, and computer code sets between various prominent scientists released following a leak from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia in the UK.

This may seem obscure, but the science involved is being used to justify the diversion of literally trillions of dollars of the world’s wealth in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by phasing out fossil fuels. The CRU is the Pentagon of global warming science, and these documents are its Pentagon Papers.
 
Don't take my word for it.  Go read the e-mails.  Threats to withold submissions for peer review, attacking those scientists with contrary opiions, and destroying data that supports the position that man made GlowBall Warming does not exist.
 
Here are three things everyone should know about the Climategate Papers. Links are provided so that the full context of every quote can be seen by anyone interested.


First, the scientists discuss manipulating data to get their preferred results. The most prominently featured scientists are paleoclimatologists, who reconstruct historical temperatures and who were responsible for a series of reconstructions that seemed to show a sharp rise in temperatures well above historical variation in recent decades.
……………

Secondly, scientists on several occasions discussed methods of subverting the scientific peer review process to ensure that skeptical papers had no access to publication.
……………

Finally, the scientists worked to circumvent the Freedom of Information process of the United Kingdom. Nowhere is this better evidenced than in the email reproduced in full below (minus Dr. Jones’ contact details):


From: Phil Jones
To: “Michael E. Mann”
Subject: IPCC & FOI
Date: Thu May 29 11:04:11 2008


Mike,

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.
Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t
have his new email address.
We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.
I see that CA claim they discovered the 1945 problem in the Nature paper!!

Cheers
Phil

The issue has been cooked up and promulgated by the likes of Algore and his fraudulent movie, books and musings.  No wonder he will not debate anyone.  It is all based on fraudlent data cooked up by psuedo scientists to promote their end goals. 
 
Andrew Bolt says other emails discuss suppressing data. East Anglia University's Professor Phil Jones wrote in 2005 that "If they ever hear there is a freedom of information act now in the UK, I think I'll delete the file rather than send it to anyone."

"Obviously some of the world's top climate scientist, ones most involved in developing this theory, involved in a massive collusion stretching from America to Britain in trying dodge, fiddle with data, destroy data when others try to check it, sceptics try to check it," says Bolt.
 
 Lies, damnable lies.